NIC configuration for NLB and fail over cluster.
what nic configuration should use iis nlb , sql fail on cluster? target avoid single point of failure connection including switches.
scenario:
2 servers in nlb clustering (domain member)
2 servers in sql , file fail on clustering (both domain controllers)
webpage iis server stored on fail on cluster (i don’t want use dfsr replication) using \\fileclustername\folder
iis servers connect sql database cluster ip.
and problem how should set nic addressing?
idea:
nlb cluster
nlb node 1
public1 & public2 = publicnictem
ip 192.168.100.50
mask: 255.255.255.0
gateway: 192.168.100.254
dns: n/a
heartbeat1
ip 10.10.100.10
mask: 255.255.255.0
gateway: n/a
dns: /na
heartbeat2
ip 10.10.110.10
mask: 255.255.255.0
gateway: n/a
dns: /na
private1 & private2 = privatenicteam
ip 172.16.100.50
mask: 255.255.255.0
gateay: n/a
dns: 172.16.100.10
172.16.100.20
nlb node 2
public1 & public2 = publicnictem
ip 192.168.100.60
mask: 255.255.255.0
gateway: 192.168.100.254
dns: n/a
heartbeat1
ip 10.10.100.20
mask: 255.255.255.0
gateway: n/a
dns: /na
heartbeat2
ip 10.10.110.20
mask: 255.255.255.0
gateway: n/a
dns: /na
private1 & private2 = privatenicteam
ip 172.16.100.60
mask: 255.255.255.0
gateay: n/a
dns: 172.16.100.10
172.16.100.20
public nlb cluster ip (on 2 publicnicteam)
192.168.100.100
mask: 255.255.255.0
fail on cluster
sql f/o node 1
private1 & private2 = privatenicteam
ip 172.16.100.10
mask: 255.255.255.0
gateay: n/a
dns: 172.16.100.10
heartbeat1
ip 10.10.120.10
mask: 255.255.255.0
gateway: n/a
dns: /na
heartbeat2
ip 10.10.130.10
mask: 255.255.255.0
gateway: n/a
dns: /na
sql f/o node 2
public1 & public2 = publicnictem
ip 172.16.100.20
mask: 255.255.255.0
gateay: n/a
dns: 172.16.100.10
heartbeat1
ip 10.10.120.20
mask: 255.255.255.0
gateway: n/a
dns: /na
heartbeat2
ip 10.10.130.20
mask: 255.255.255.0
gateway: n/a
dns: /na
public sql f/o cluster ip (on 2 publicnicteam)
172.16.100.50
mask: 255.255.255.0
does make sense?
this work, in opinion whole architecture liitle bit "overpowered". how many 9's have achieve ?
bye.
thorstenwujek
Windows Server > High Availability (Clustering)
Comments
Post a Comment