chkdsk question
i designing new storage system in 80tb range. we've traditionally used raid cards , ntfs, looking @ refs , storage spaces. 1 of big benefits of refs not having run chkdsk. on new volume though, storing larger files - files in 2gb range. fact volume not full of bunch of small files mean chkdsk run "fast", @ least in comparison bunch of smaller files? i'd love stick ntfs because it's been around long, , want figure out if our workload might make more feasible. thanks!
not run “fast” when storing larger files in volume. refs designed work extremely large data sets—petabytes , larger—without performance impact. file system, refs not resiliency, great maintaining extremely large amounts of data.
more detailed information, refer article below:
windows server 2012: refs replace ntfs? when should use it?
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askpfeplat/archive/2013/01/02/windows-server-2012-does-refs-replace-ntfs-when-should-i-use-it.aspx
best regards,
mandy
please remember mark replies answers if , unmark them if provide no help. if have feedback technet subscriber support, contact tnmff@microsoft.com.
Windows Server > File Services and Storage
Comments
Post a Comment