Sharing iSCSI NIC with Live Migration Traffic

-

we've got blade server connected iscsi san.  blade has (6) total ports, 4x1gb ports & 2x10gb, & 10gb ports used iscsi connectivity configured mpio.  blade running server 2012 hyper-v.

i'd utilize 10gb network both iscsi & "shared nothing" live migration (we're not looking @ failover clustering quite yet) wondering if else has similar setup & if you'd advise for/against it?  understand it's best practice dedicate physical nics iscsi when possible, blade bit "port challenged" i'd love take advantage of 10gb speed vm transfers.  if that's not advisable i'll team (4) 1gb ports & route lm transfers on along normal guest/os traffic.

thanks in advance. -jb

well it's little less complicated set (especially in 2012), , great benefits. live migration shared storage faster without. have central management point of vm's (cluster manager) or better yet, can start testing out vmm. concerns 10gbe setup, can utilize other traffics, i'd suggest implementing qos policies don't grind performance halt if you're doing somehow choke pipe (unlikely) :)



Windows Server  >  Hyper-V



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WIMMount (HSM) causing cluster storage to go redirected (2012r2 DC)

-
looking options resolve error , prevent in future. thanks help. hardware: 2 node dell hv cluster running2012r2 dc 8 nic/ea in multiplex mode 4x hyper-v 4x hosts storage: 2x synology nas, accessed through iscsi hosts , cluster relevant logs: log name:      microsoft-windows-failoverclustering/diagnostic source:        microsoft-windows-failoverclustering date:          event id:      2050 task category: none level:         warning keywords:       user:          system computer:      l description: [dcm] filter wimmount found @ unsafe altitude 180700 log name:      system source:        microsoft-windows-failoverclustering date:         event id:      5125 task category: cluster shared volume level:         warning keywords:       user:          system computer: description: cluster shared volume 'volume1' ('cluster disk 1') has identified 1 or more active filter drivers on device stack interfere csv operatio
Read more

Failed to delete the test record dcdiag-test-record in zone test.com

-
ps c:\users\administrator.test> dcdiag /test:dns directory server diagnosis performing initial setup:    trying find home server...    home server = dc02    * identified ad forest.    done gathering initial info. doing initial required tests    testing server: default-first-site-name\dc02       starting test: connectivity          ......................... dc02 passed test connectivity doing primary tests    testing server: default-first-site-name\dc02       starting test: dns          dns tests running , not hung. please wait few minutes...          ......................... dc02 passed test dns    running partition tests on : forestdnszones    running partition tests on : domaindnszones    running partition tests on : schema    running partition tests on : configuration    running partition tests on : test    running enterprise tests on : test.com       starting test: dns          test results domain
Read more

Azure MFA with Azure AD and RDS

-
i have setup following lab in azure , need help. a server (domain controller) , remote desktop services. and server multi factor authentication server. i have setup following one http://www.rdsgurus.com/uncategorized/step-by-step-using-windows-server-2012-r2-rd-gateway-with-azure-multifactor-authentication/ and when im connecting got following error. the user "domain\username", on client computer "xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx", did not meet connection authorization policy requirements , therefore not authorized access rd gateway server. authentication method used was: "ntlm" , connection protocol used: "rpc-http". following error occurred: "23003". also on security log i've got following authentication details: connection request policy name: ts gateway authorization policy network policy name: - authentication provider: radius proxy authentication server: test.test.local authentication type: - eap t
Read more